Asrock QC5000-ITX/WiFi

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock QC5000-ITX/WiFi (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '17 at 08:38
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Memory 24.1 1-Core 15 2-Core 29.5 15% 22.9 Pts	4-Core 57.9 8-Core 70.4 8% 64.2 Pts	64-Core 67.1 4% 67.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 9832) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 1.57 Reflection 3.15 Parallax 1.81 1% 2.18 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 2.43 2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11272 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2303 (B1) Unknown 89 89 213 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 50 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 67 (F1) Unknown 99 99 69988955772	49.5% Average	Read 364 Write 298 Mixed 313 72% 325 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 7.99 54% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 22.3 DQ Write 29.4 DQ Mixed 10.9 12% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 22GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 166 4608 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3825 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15993 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3379 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 261 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 179 179 65427 (C2) HDA temperature 123 102 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.3% Average	Read 75.5 Write 82.1 Mixed 86.3 62% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.24 84% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99U5474-016.A00LF 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.9 3% 1.13 GB/s	Latency 291 14% 291 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 18%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical QC5000-ITX/WiFi Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock QC5000-ITX/WiFi

CPU
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	1x

SSD
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	1x

RAM
PSD34G160081 1x4GBPatriotBench 26%, 818 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $36

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16