ARLT Quattro Power Station GTX750 R1 W8

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	ARLT Quattro Power Station GTX750 R1 W8 (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI B85-G41 PC Mate(MS-7850)
Memory	20 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140108
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '18 at 22:36
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 167 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 310 36% 281 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB; Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (76 fps cap detected)	61% Good	Lighting 75.8 Reflection 76.7 Parallax 75.5 62% 76 fps	MRender 70.1 Gravity 71.1 Splatting 75 59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 8 (64) Unknown 100 100 66592 (65) Unknown 100 100 12576 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 19 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1382 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 37 100 197569675301 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 125 (EA) Unknown 100 100 73 (F1) Unknown 100 100 114 (F2) Unknown 100 100 75 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	64% Good	Read 459 Write 257 Mixed 263 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 11.2 75% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 23.3 61% 132 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 934GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 169 4425 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1482 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7716 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1467 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 114 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 185 185 45452 (C2) HDA temperature 115 103 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.3% Good	Read 115 Write 120 Mixed 107 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.29 107% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 84%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB 7,574 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2TB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 108 Write 108 Mixed 72.5 121% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.18 67% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 58%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 16,068 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	7.07% Terrible	Read 25.7 Write 10.3 Mixed 13.8 18% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.53 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.007 17% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.07% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.1% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 17.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 16 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16