Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H97-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150421
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '18 at 10:53
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 91.8 1-Core 109 2-Core 213 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 403 54% 401 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB CLim: 1319 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Lighting 23.2 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 20.9 19% 20.6 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 23.7 Splatting 17.3 18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 120GB-$75 5,451 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: RG20 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 9 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9083 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 311 (AA) Unknown 79 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 37 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 38 100 103082360870 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 37 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3117006 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 40 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 79 100 0 (E9) Unknown 45 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3117006 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2085917 (F9) Unknown 100 100 99779	75.3% Very good	Read 498 Write 201 Mixed 210 66% 303 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 86.6 4K Mixed 18.4 119% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 46.4 75% 144 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 807GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 63 232236431 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1183 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 3443512 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1170 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 359 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 55 622395425 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1189 (C2) HDA temperature 33 22 94489280545 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 4 1 232236431 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 108267535598444 (F1) Unknown 100 253 720927943 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1336660703	96.9% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 170 Mixed 49.7 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.33 104% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 113%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB 2,097 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 5GB free, PID c08a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	4.33% Terrible	Read 17.9 Write 4.12 Mixed 6.76 10% 9.61 MB/s	4K Read 3.42 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.007 13% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.33% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 16,472 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	58.7% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 18.2 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 17.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	283x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	170x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	152x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	153x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	129x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	86x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	32x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	31x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	88x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	68x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $435

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16