User System

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	GBT___ NVDAACPI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-K8NMF-9
Memory	2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081022
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 04 '18 at 12:07
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+ 28 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 63.9 1-Core 34.6 2-Core 64.3 36% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 64.5 8-Core 65.4 9% 64.9 Pts	64-Core 68.8 4% 68.8 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 3523) 1GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	7.74% Terrible	Lighting 9.27 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 7.47 8% 9.07 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 9.77 Splatting 10.7 8% 9.77 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.74% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2CT040G3 40GB 1,759 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10362 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2286 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1378 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 18685 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 67 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 147952 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 261886 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 5 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 62068742 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 147952 (F2) Unknown 100 100 184084	25.1% Poor	Read 125 Write 46.6 Mixed 60.8 17% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 11.6 54% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 19.6 DQ Write 35.3 DQ Mixed 11.8 13% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 37%
WD WD1600YS-01SHB1 165GB-$90 880 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 119GB free Firmware: 20.06C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 183 3775 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6810 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12140 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5851 (C2) HDA temperature 126 93 21 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	31.1% Below average	Read 54.7 Write 53.1 Mixed 26.4 33% 44.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.37 102% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 35%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 100GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 161 160 4941 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4945 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 10004 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3957 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 2084 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4945 (C2) HDA temperature 121 106 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	31.5% Below average	Read 56.6 Write 52.8 Mixed 27.3 34% 45.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.38 104% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16