User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170110
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 19 '18 at 20:35
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 207
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 600
60% 491 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 6755) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4944
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.94% Terrible
Lighting 3.13
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 3.03
3% 7.29 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.57
4% 4.36 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.94%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,299
Write 1,359
Mixed 1,577
386% 1,745 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 43.4
182% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 445
DQ Mixed 155
182% 310 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 247%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 24
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 25.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback