| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus M4A785TD-M EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100813 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 02 '18 at 18:38 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | HRV-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.8%
Good
|
55% 85.4 Pts
|
29% 216 Pts
|
14% 218 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
MSI(1462 2326) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
14% 17.7 fps
|
17% 20.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
36% 163 MB/s
|
71% 23.1 MB/s
|
18% 30.1 MB/s
|
|
|
73.5%
Very good
|
89% 119 MB/s
|
124% 1.37 MB/s
| |
|
|
53.5%
Above average
|
64% 85.6 MB/s
|
86% 0.94 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
1024, 4096, 1024, 4096 MB
|
30.7%
Below average
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
22% 7.7 GB/s
|
60% 66.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A785TD-M EVO Builds (Compare 62 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A785TD-M EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 14x |
| Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples | 5x |
| Phenom II X3 720AMDBench 48%, 2,612 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples | 7x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 4x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $144 |