Asrock X299 OC Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X299 OC Formula (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '18 at 18:37
Run Duration	298 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	79%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 77.7 1-Core 125 2-Core 251 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 1,013 90% 759 Pts	64-Core 1,678 104% 1,678 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 167 Parallax 168 113% 158 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 175 Splatting 126 116% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1359 1328 1304 1297 1283 1277 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	245% Outstanding	Read 1,809 Write 1,410 Mixed 822 SusWrite 1,308 299% 1,337 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 99.2 4K Mixed 55.7 184% 64.9 MB/s	DQ Read 863 DQ Write 728 DQ Mixed 802 599% 798 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 354%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 1.5TB free Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1101 1096 1092 1089 1090 1094 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 1,714 Write 1,275 Mixed 793 SusWrite 1,094 272% 1,219 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 59.9 206% 74.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,058 DQ Write 923 DQ Mixed 977 736% 986 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 354%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 186 187 187 187 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 329 Write 317 Mixed 314 SusWrite 187 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 37.4 123% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 207 154% 205 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 2TB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 187 186 187 187 186 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 331 Write 317 Mixed 314 SusWrite 186 65% 287 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 55.2 4K Mixed 38.8 125% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 206 154% 205 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 133%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$221 1,110 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 7TB free Firmware: 01.01H02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 219 233 227 220 223 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 216 Write 228 Mixed 97.5 SusWrite 224 140% 191 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.4 298% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$221 1,110 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 9TB free Firmware: 01.01H02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 233 239 228 236 232 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	138% Outstanding	Read 247 Write 244 Mixed 110 SusWrite 234 152% 209 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.3 293% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 133%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$221 1,110 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 7.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 235 228 233 238 233 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 218 Write 220 Mixed 100 SusWrite 234 141% 193 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.3 291% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 133%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$221 1,110 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 9.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 238 238 236 240 240 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 238 Write 242 Mixed 111 SusWrite 239 151% 207 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.2 286% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 133%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$221 1,110 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 8.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 230 235 238 232 235 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 62.9 MC Mixed 32.5 124% 43.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 10 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 OC Formula Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X299 OC Formula

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $413Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	7x
Core i9-7980XEIntel $1,286Bench 80%, 4,653 samples	7x
Core i9-7920XIntel $250Bench 82%, 5,430 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	4x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	3x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia $651Bench 240%, 46,082 samples	3x

SSD
860 Pro 512GBSamsung $150Bench 110%, 16,934 samples	5x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	2x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	2x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	7x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	4x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $842

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X299 OC Formula

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X299 OC Formula

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)