| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Mikrolog PRO-H67 IO (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK P8H67-M EVO |
| Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120216 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 22 '18 at 16:40 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
75.6%
Very good
|
72% 122 Pts
|
48% 358 Pts
|
22% 355 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F0) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.3%
Below average
|
31% 41.7 fps
|
35% 43.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 136 92 101 101 97 MB/s
|
49.3%
Average
|
41% 184 MB/s
|
99% 31.9 MB/s
|
32% 47.7 MB/s
|
|
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 142 143 144 142 143 MB/s
|
81.9%
Excellent
|
92% 126 MB/s
|
188% 1.43 MB/s
| |
|
Generic Mass-Storage 32GB
9GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 7.2 10 6.8 9 8.1 MB/s
|
6.06%
Terrible
|
8% 7.57 MB/s
|
36% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29%
Poor
|
26% 9 GB/s
|
25% 8.9 GB/s
|
59% 67.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRO-H67 IO Builds (Compare 7 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Mikrolog PRO-H67 IO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 2x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 2x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
| GTX 570Nvidia $350Bench 20%, 22,303 samples | 1x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $310 |