MSI H97M-G43(MS-7924)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7924
MotherboardMSI H97M-G43(MS-7924)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150728
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '18 at 11:00
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 394
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
MSI(1462 7924) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 6.97
3% 5.83 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.96
6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 515GB
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 28 34 41 44 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
Read 92.5
Write 135
Mixed 62
SusWrite 38.7
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.3 MB/s
Intel Raid 1 Volume 485GB
330GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 30 36 43 45 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 82.3
Write 74.5
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 40
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-G43(MS-7924) Builds (Compare 548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI H97M-G43(MS-7924) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback