Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 149 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 404 43% 342 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7470M 449 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 167D) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.910.0.0 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	2.44% Terrible	Lighting 3.13 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 2.41 3% 3.09 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 3.57 2% 2.59 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.44% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
P3-512 512GB 2,855 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.74 SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 325 82 90 88 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 294 Write 111 Mixed 292 SusWrite 173 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 21.1 83% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 175 165% 254 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 104%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 12GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.5 11 10 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	7.59% Terrible	Read 29.4 Write 21.4 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 10.7 20% 17 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.59% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	138x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	45x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	3x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	8x
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $53