Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 4730s

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP ProBook 4730s  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 167C
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 15:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 149
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 404
43% 342 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7470M
HP(103C 167D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.910.0.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.13
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 2.41
3% 3.09 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 3.57
2% 2.59 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-512 512GB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 325 82 90 88 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 294
Write 111
Mixed 292
SusWrite 173
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 21.1
83% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 175
165% 254 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 104%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
12GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 8.5 11 10 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Read 29.4
Write 21.4
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 10.7
20% 17 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 4730s Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 4730s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback