Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '18 at 19:51
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$132 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 121 2-Core 226 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 453 52% 405 Pts	64-Core 383 24% 383 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.48% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.85 Parallax 3.41 4% 4.18 fps	MRender 5.71 Gravity 4.27 Splatting 3.09 3% 4.36 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.48% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 383 368 362 365 354 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 429 Mixed 367 SusWrite 374 93% 412 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 89.1 4K Mixed 42 166% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 40.7 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 55.5 78% 135 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 134%
WD WD20EARS-00MVWB0 4TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2TB free Firmware: FJ1M SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.3 2.3 2.4 3 3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 184 Write 7.3 Mixed 38 SusWrite 2.8 43% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.8 232% 2 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 97%
Toshiba MK3252GSX 320GB-$70 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 43GB free Firmware: LV010M SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 39 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 38.5 Write 39.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 39.8 28% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 34%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 737GB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 151 150 147 151 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 144 Write 124 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 150 163% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-4GVR F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-2400C15-4GVR F4-2400C15-8GVR 24GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.6% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 21.1 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 20.9 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	918x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	323x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	182x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	267x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	218x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	202x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	56x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	51x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	93x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $629

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16