Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4157GA4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 4157GA4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '18 at 00:58
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3550
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 157
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 372
41% 323 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV300S37A120G ÿ 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 73 52 52 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
Read 61.5
Write 59
Mixed 101
SusWrite 58.8
16% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 24.8
73% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 84.7
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 79.2
64% 89.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
38GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 58 58 52 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
41% Average
Read 86.8
Write 65
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 55.9
49% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
104GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 71 79 79 70 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 72.5
Write 69.7
Mixed 49
SusWrite 75.8
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB
74GB free
Firmware: 3.AH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 28 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 29
Write 14.3
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 29.5
17% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM 15h Reserved 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4157GA4 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 4157GA4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback