Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 04 '18 at 15:30
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 87
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 144
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 145
18% 140 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 1.62
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.51 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.26
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 100 103 84 85 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 120
Write 125
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 87.8
63% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 108%
MB2000GCWDA 2TB
255GB free
Firmware: HPGD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 103 104 102 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 116
Write 110
Mixed 61
SusWrite 104
71% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 105%
MB2000GCWDA 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HPGD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 141 142 136 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 147
Write 140
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 142
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 105%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
916GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 26 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 23.8
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 26.5
29% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $227
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback