Asrock Z97M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141212
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 06 '18 at 04:20
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 109
2-Core 181
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 560
58% 464 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 181
Parallax 189
131% 177 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 167
Splatting 117
109% 135 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6S 256GB-$166
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 330 350 404 369 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 395
Mixed 289
SusWrite 378
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 37.9
139% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 210
192% 293 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 104%
FUJITSU MHW2160BJ G1 160GB
33GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.9 0.2 0.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12% Very poor
Read 55.7
Write 50
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 0.5
43% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
60% 0.73 MB/s
WDC WD32 02ABYS-01B7A0 320GB
79GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 96 92 93 93 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 74.7
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 93
102% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
236GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 96 92 93 93 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.8% Below average
Read 54.5
Write 56.2
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 93.6
84% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 32%
WD Elements 2TB
29GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 84 88 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 76
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 88
102% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 125
Write 125
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 0
101% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 59.9
67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z97M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $570
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback