Asus P8H61-M PLUS V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M PLUS V3  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 07 '18 at 13:02
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 188
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 354
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 19.5
16% 18.6 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 16.1
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OBM Virtual Product 54GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 10
Mixed 10
SusWrite 1.7
5% 7.23 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.2
462% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 35%
OBM Virtual Product 2TB
304GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.1 4 3.7 3.8 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 8.5
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 3.8
5% 6.82 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.8
303% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 22%
OBM Virtual Product 2TB
122GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4 4 3.7 3.8 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Read 6.2
Write 7.3
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 3.8
5% 6.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
170% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M PLUS V3 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PLUS V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback