Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U758

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK U758  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2B4
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 10:28
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8650U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 124
2-Core 217
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 464
50% 399 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Fujitsu(10CF 1959) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 24.20.100.6096
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.97% Terrible
Lighting 7.03
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7.25
6% 8.18 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 15.6
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.97%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disco virtuale Microsoft 54GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 202 226 201 229 215 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.6% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 370
Mixed 364
SusWrite 217
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 46.6
153% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 357
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 95%
Samsung MZNLN512HAJQ-00007 512GB
272GB free
Firmware: MVT2206Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 203 226 201 229 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 411
Write 401
Mixed 366
SusWrite 218
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 44.3
167% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 357
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 25.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK U758 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U758

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback