Zotac XXXXXX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemZotac XXXXXX  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC XXXXXX
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 19:03
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 867
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 38.6
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 53.9
26% 41.7 Pts
4-Core 44.5
8-Core 26.6
5% 35.5 Pts
64-Core 36.8
2% 36.8 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Zotac(19DA A237) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.84
1% 1.04 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.74
1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 22 73 70 80 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 52.2
Write 63.6
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 61.9
35% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
62% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-093.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XXXXXX Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Zotac XXXXXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback