Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 18 '18 at 15:17
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 94.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 221
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 633
66% 527 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841F) 2GB
CLim: 1255 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 33.7
24% 29.9 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 28.7
29% 36.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 368 250 355 496 510 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 564
Write 114
Mixed 370
SusWrite 394
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 24.5
92% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 184
186% 298 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 182%
WD WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 150GB
9GB free
Firmware: 20.07P20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 46 54 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 79
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 58
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
199% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 47%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
174GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 94 72 81 93 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 98
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 86.4
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 80%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 6GB
5GB free, PID 0716
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.6 2.5 2.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.72% Terrible
Read 8.3
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 2.4
5% 4.38 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.72%
Great: 3%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB
4GB free, PID 0716
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.8 2.5 2.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 7.8
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 1.3
9% 7.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 11%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
79GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 26 20 23 25 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 25
Mixed 25
SusWrite 23.5
35% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 36.2
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 101%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback