Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '16 at 17:17
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 130
61% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 294
33% 258 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3658) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6510
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 16
Parallax 16.8
16% 17.6 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 16.9
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$57
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 481
Write 48.6
Mixed 124
46% 218 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 3.13
68% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 1.5
25% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 89%
Kingston SS200S330G 30GB
12GB free
Firmware: S8FM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 470
Write 96.6
Mixed 160
52% 242 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 9.16
95% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 90.9
DQ Mixed 24.3
46% 94 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
191GB free
Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 61
Write 41.5
Mixed 49.3
38% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.33
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
92GB free
Firmware: 19.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 71.9
Write 70
Mixed 70.6
53% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.4
102% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.7% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback