Asus H87-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87-PRO (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '18 at 22:47
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4771-$129 11,180 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 91.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 231 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 587 62% 493 Pts	64-Core 588 36% 588 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 132 132 130 133 133 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 399 Mixed 295 SusWrite 165 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 45.1 161% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 169 175% 284 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 108%
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 82GB free Firmware: V8X01c45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 354 350 347 348 337 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Read 358 Write 338 Mixed 309 SusWrite 350 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 84.2 4K Mixed 24.9 112% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 124 106% 150 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 32GB 950 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 29GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 12 14 14 14 10 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	9.61% Terrible	Read 38.4 Write 11.7 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 12.5 30% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.61% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	58.1% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.7 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87-PRO Builds (Compare 573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PRO

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	139x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	75x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	74x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	56x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	35x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	17x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16