ADD TO PC
BUILD

Novatech PC-X007876

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	81.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Novatech PC-X007876 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '18 at 15:07
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$190 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	93% Outstanding	Memory 88.8 1-Core 138 2-Core 271 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 522 8-Core 914 87% 718 Pts	64-Core 1,135 70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2012 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.3% Excellent	Lighting 100 Reflection 113 Parallax 105 82% 106 fps	MRender 97.8 Gravity 94.8 Splatting 100 80% 97.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1783 Write 939 Mixed 389 226% 1,037 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 44.5 198% 77 MB/s	DQ Read 1,027 DQ Write 774 DQ Mixed 783 617% 862 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 89 90 87 68 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 106 Write 63 Mixed 52 SusWrite 78.9 55% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 100%
Seagate ST3300831AS 300GB 1,245 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 45GB free Firmware: 3.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 51 52 51 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 47.2 Write 13.3 Mixed 32 SusWrite 51.1 27% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 37%
G-raid with Thunderbolt 12TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 684GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 224 229 226 227 230 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 216 Write 217 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 227 133% 183 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.4 291% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 207%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 59GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 91 93 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 108 Write 110 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 92.2 71% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 109%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 3TB free, PID 8016 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 139 139 142 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 138 Write 140 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 140 146% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 65%
External RAID 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 898GB free, PID ce31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 41 42 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 38.2 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 41.2 50% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 20%
ST310005 20AS 1TB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 83GB free, PID 1018 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 39.5 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 41.9 49% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 20%
Ext Hard Disk 1TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 430GB free, PID ce33 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 39.7 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 41 53% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 13,232 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.6% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 18.8 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 20.6 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback