Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 24 '16 at 20:04
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 133
61% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 307
34% 268 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
MSI(1462 2610) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6510
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 9.69
9% 11.6 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 15.6
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin ECO3 120GB-$50
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O112 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 433
Write 248
Mixed 249
68% 310 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 24.5
102% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 52.5
74% 140 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 72%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
915GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 160
Write 125
Mixed 137
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.48
145% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $384
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback