PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 8.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 18.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Dell Studio XPS 9100 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 05DN3X |
Memory | 33.8 GB free of 36 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20101021 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 22 '18 at 00:07 |
Run Duration | 220 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
MSI(1462 2360) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 980 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 364.51
|
8.92%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung PM830 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM02D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 27 27 27 28 MB/s
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate ST2000NM0055-1V4104 2TB
828GB free
Firmware: TN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 154 153 154 155 MB/s
|
95.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 120 121 121 121 121 MB/s
|
67.1%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
989GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 108 109 110 110 110 MB/s
|
57.6%
Above average
|
|||
23.6%
Poor
|
||||
WDC WD15 EARS-00Z5B1 1.5TB
111GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.1 MB/s
|
0.62%
Terrible
|
|||
ST310005 28AS 1TB
740GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.1 MB/s
|
8.99%
Terrible
|
|||
ST310005 24AS 1TB
859GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s
|
7.88%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.3%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 930Intel $145Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 199x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 90x |
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples | 28x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 30x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 18x |
SSD | |
---|---|
SD8TB8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 73%, 213 samples | 20x |
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples | 15x |
FTM1TN325H 1TBBench 70%, 177 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $265 |