Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z270N-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z270N-WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270N-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '18 at 13:39
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$152
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 276
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 705
78% 615 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 116
Parallax 110
86% 110 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 96.1
Splatting 102
81% 98.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$40
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 471 193 149 155 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 442
Write 440
Mixed 380
SusWrite 263
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 34.7
139% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 303
221% 284 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 95%
Sandisk SD8TB8U512G1001 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: X4133101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 293 265 267 266 267 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 446
Mixed 326
SusWrite 300
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 41
160% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 227
195% 288 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 99%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
4GB free
Firmware: MU01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 400
Write 424
Mixed 291
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 41.7
156% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 179
155% 222 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 107%
Inateck 500GB
240GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 15.8
Write 12.3
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 54.2
36% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 161%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 22.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270N-WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270N-WIFI - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $894
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback