Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+ 784 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Memory 46.3 1-Core 25.2 2-Core 45.4 26% 39 Pts	4-Core 45.1 8-Core 44.6 6% 44.8 Pts	64-Core 47.4 3% 47.4 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8200 1,005 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Nvidia(10DE CB84) 128MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.25% Terrible	Lighting 0.17 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.2 fps	MRender 0.67 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.65 0% 0.56 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.25% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK4032GSX 40GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: AS211G SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 19 12 13 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	7.45% Terrible	Read 11 Write 11.9 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 14.7 9% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 69% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.45% Great: 18%
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150 998 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 233GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 12 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8% Terrible	Read 12.9 Write 14.5 Mixed 13 SusWrite 14.7 10% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 52% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	MC Read 3 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3 9% 3.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM