Medion Erazer X6601 MD60289

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Erazer X6601 MD60289  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION N155RD1M
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '18 at 16:57
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 28.5
2-Core 47.7
32% 45.4 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 351
32% 267 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Clevo(1558 1501) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 20.3
19% 20.2 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 17.2
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD PHISON 512GB PS3110-S10C TLC
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 187 148 22 119 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 399
Write 398
Mixed 324
SusWrite 149
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 16.6
56% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 206
167% 232 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST1500LM006 HN-M151RAD 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 117 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 107
Write 84.4
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 117
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
286GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 70 70 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 70.2
Write 70.3
Mixed 44
SusWrite 71.5
86% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 23.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 13
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer X6601 MD60289 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X6601 MD60289

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback