Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory30 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '16 at 10:44
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 843
85% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,077
67% 1,077 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
Nvidia(10DE 0719) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 8.33
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 2.78
7% 6.4 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 5.52
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,361
Write 1,462
Mixed 1,608
400% 1,810 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 42.7
190% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 44.7
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 30.5
80% 157 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 251%
Great: 283%
Lexar CF USB_3_0 Read 128GB
109GB free, PID b049
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 151
Write 123
Mixed 116
162% 130 MB/s
4K Read 8.88
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 1.18
121% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
54GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 257
Write 157
Mixed 150
221% 188 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 4.84
564% 8.63 MB/s
DQ Read 11.3
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 5
600% 9.25 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%
Lexar SD USB_3_0 Read 64GB
49GB free, PID b049
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 89.7
Write 88.5
Mixed 84.6
113% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.61
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 1.02
103% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 45.3
128% 44.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 23.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 116%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $856
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback