Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X560UD

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X560UD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X560UD
Memory	3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180330
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '18 at 17:06
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	68%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 106 2-Core 180 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 384 47% 361 Pts	64-Core 386 24% 386 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 11E1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 23.7 Parallax 7.41 0% 10.4 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 7.07 Splatting 15.6 10% 11.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1002 128GB 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 103 107 105 106 105 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 404 Write 185 Mixed 285 SusWrite 108 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 30.1 97% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 220 180% 258 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 931GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 116 115 119 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 124 Write 105 Mixed 88.4 SusWrite 118 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 0.7 275% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA425S6BJR6N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 6GB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2400, 2400 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	65.2% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 24.8 MC Mixed 19.5 66% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 17.7 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X560UD Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X560UD

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	221x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	128x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	213x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	135x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	70x
SD9SN8W128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 3,521 samples	22x
RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 58%, 2,813 samples	12x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	109x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	23x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16