EVGA Classified SR-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardEVGA Classified SR-2  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101028
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 09:18
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 126
54% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 392
39% 317 Pts
64-Core 623
39% 623 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 85.7
54% 74.2 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 56.7
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 730 Series 240GB-$250
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 205 206 206 204 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 300
Write 210
Mixed 201
SusWrite 204
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 25
84% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 200
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT12GX3M3A2000C9 6x4GB
6 of 18 slots used
24GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 17
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $922
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback