Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 21 '18 at 03:26
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 710
66% 551 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 147
Parallax 127
98% 131 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 136
Splatting 103
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 259 267 253 262 252 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 421
Mixed 351
SusWrite 280
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.3
176% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
573GB free
Firmware: CC56
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 172 170 173 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 151
Mixed 82
SusWrite 170
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 1,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $637
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback