Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Getac B300G6

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Getac B300G6 (all builds)
Motherboard	GETAC B300G6
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171121
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '18 at 04:15
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6300U 59,619 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CUU504, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 167 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 245 33% 245 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(1071 B306) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	4.54% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 8.77 Parallax 5.97 5% 7.11 fps	MRender 6.38 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 0.09 3% 4.09 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD420KSE2 256GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1225L7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 287 298 297 297 298 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 471 Write 297 Mixed 273 SusWrite 291 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 32.4 116% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 182 162% 243 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 85%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB 1,859 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 8.2 9.1 9.1 8 9.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	6.3% Terrible	Read 22.7 Write 1.5 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 8.4 10% 9.58 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.3% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 76.C31BG.D230B 1x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	40.1% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 13.7 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback