Notebook P15SM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 59% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemNotebook P15SM  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P15SM
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '18 at 22:13
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 29%
CPU Throttled 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 82
42% 63.4 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 197
21% 167 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5106) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 2.25
1% 7 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.57
2% 2.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 364 391 383 288 390 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 737
Write 264
Mixed 172
SusWrite 365
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 11
46% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 130
113% 168 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
95GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 95 142 186 188 196 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 172
Write 216
Mixed 170
SusWrite 159
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 21.1
78% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 178
134% 178 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 85%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
296GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 106 106 106 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 96
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 104
58% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-069.A00LF 99U5428-053.A00LF 99U5428-069.A00LF 99U5428-069.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 15.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P15SM Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook P15SM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback