Acer Aspire 4755

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 4755  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4755
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '18 at 10:34
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 53.3
2-Core 89.6
49% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 137
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0507) 1.8GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 1.44
2% 2.74 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 39 72 102 113 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 66.8
Write 93
Mixed 54
SusWrite 83.8
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
204% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 67%
IT-CEO Storage 120GB
9GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 24.3
Write 25.7
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 24.1
32% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4755 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $81
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback