Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '18 at 21:31
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.55 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 160
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 493
49% 400 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.9% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 65
Parallax 58.3
52% 62.4 fps
MRender 69.2
Gravity 61.4
Splatting 51.7
49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
598GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 172 172 171 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 370
Write 324
Mixed 328
SusWrite 171
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 44.4
144% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 229
172% 231 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
283GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 172 172 173 173 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 367
Write 323
Mixed 309
SusWrite 172
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 39.1
127% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 147
111% 149 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 129%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
698GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 107 105 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 115
Write 99.5
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 107
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback