Supermicro X10SRL-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X10SRL-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SRL-F
Memory18.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140827
Uptime44.8 Days
Run DateJun 23 '16 at 03:07
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 118
46% 76.2 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 418
41% 334 Pts
64-Core 618
38% 618 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ1T02CSX 1TB
866GB free
Firmware: JXGB4102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 507
Write 454
Mixed 480
107% 480 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 28.4
86% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 117
116% 186 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 106%
LSI Logical Volume 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 185
Write 97
Mixed 115
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 0.48
4K Mixed 0.17
69% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung (date:15/17) M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 40.6
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 16.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10SRL-F Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro X10SRL-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback