| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit색 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141024 |
| Uptime | 4.8 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 09 '18 at 01:54 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.5%
Good
|
54% 86.4 Pts
|
34% 278 Pts
|
22% 359 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.64
|
22.1%
Poor
|
21% 27.5 fps
|
24% 30.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MGTEC 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0423A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 144 18 30 37 28 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
50% 229 MB/s
|
27% 7.13 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
930GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 149 2.9 12 MB/s
|
75.7%
Very good
|
86% 117 MB/s
|
112% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.2%
Below average
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
27% 9.5 GB/s
|
53% 75.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 193x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 191x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $152 |