Asrock X79 Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140214
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 22:55
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 579
65% 508 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.4% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 133
Parallax 131
96% 127 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 127
Splatting 106
89% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 208 205 207 204 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 469
Write 394
Mixed 344
SusWrite 212
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 33.1
111% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 306
228% 303 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
32GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 364 361 362 353 229 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 473
Write 445
Mixed 359
SusWrite 336
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 34
114% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 317
239% 321 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
369GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 129 131 126 126 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 291
Write 184
Mixed 222
SusWrite 128
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 24.5
79% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 64.3
DQ Mixed 79.4
62% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 97%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 129 131 126 126 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 319
Write 183
Mixed 230
SusWrite 128
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 23.8
80% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 79.5
63% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
182GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 161 161 162 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 148
Write 114
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 160
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
222GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 159 161 161 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 132
Write 80.5
Mixed 68
SusWrite 160
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 35.7
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme9 - $1,200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,960
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback