Asus G751JT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus G751JT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G751JT
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150424
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 25 '16 at 20:27
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 106
2-Core 200
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 545
56% 455 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Asus(1043 22DA) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6510
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 38.2
36% 41.4 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 38.3
33% 40.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S128G1002 128GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3310002 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 403
Write 344
Mixed 240
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 23.7
116% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 60.8
99% 193 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 83%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
791GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 103
Write 108
Mixed 107
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
78% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.1% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G751JT Builds (Compare 639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus G751JT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback