PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 8.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z200 SFF Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B48h |
Memory | 6.5 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160211 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 16 '18 at 22:45 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3470
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
71.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
PwrHis(1787 2325) 3GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
8.42%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend TS16GSSD25S-S 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: V090331
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 114 115 114 114 MB/s
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 78 62 91 88 90 MB/s
|
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
40%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 14x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 13x |
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 17x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 9x |
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 2x |
SSD | |
---|---|
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples | 3x |
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples | 2x |
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $70 |