Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 84% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 SE  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2271
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150730
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '18 at 18:14
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 27%
CPU Throttled 84%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 30.8
2-Core 48
34% 47.5 Pts
4-Core 57.5
8-Core 58.2
8% 57.8 Pts
64-Core 54.3
3% 54.3 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300
HP(103C 2271) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 2.81
1% 2.21 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 4.09
3% 3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN3Q-256G-1006 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 324 335 333 358 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 333
Write 355
Mixed 218
SusWrite 323
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 15
49% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 63.4
67% 111 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 746448-381 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback