Dell OptiPlex 760

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell OptiPlex 760
Motherboard	Dell OptiPlex 760 (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '18 at 21:41
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 75.3 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 86.4 45% 68.2 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 170 22% 168 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 8C90) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	3.57% Terrible	Lighting 4.23 Reflection 3.81 Parallax 4.22 4% 4.09 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 3.23 Splatting 5.13 4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.57% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0809B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 27 31 30 27 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.3% Below average	Read 253 Write 34.4 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 26.9 18% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 7.7 59% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 16.3 DQ Mixed 13.7 28% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 93%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 200GB 534 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 61GB free Firmware: 3.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 47 42 47 47 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 47.2 Write 48.9 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 45.7 32% 43.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 34%
Toshiba StorE HDD 1TB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 221GB free, PID 0b16 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 28.6 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 27.4 38% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 20%
ST350041 8AS 500GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 41GB free, PID 0370 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 34.7 Write 28.4 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 13.9 32% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 20%
Toshiba StorE HDD 500GB 390 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 106GB free, PID 0b15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	8.75% Terrible	Read 30.8 Write 23.5 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 13.6 26% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.75% Great: 19%
SAMSUNG HM320II 320GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 131GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 23.1 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 13.8 30% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 89.8 45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OptiPlex 760 Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 760

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	120x
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples	27x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	26x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	68x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	26x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	22x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	147x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	53x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16