Asus A78M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A78M-A  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateDec 29 '18 at 12:31
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 72
2-Core 128
58% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 214
26% 202 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
MSI(1462 2710) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 21
13% 17.3 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 18.7
13% 16 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SS DSC2BW180H6 180GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 176 180 179 186 167 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.5% Very good
Read 322
Write 216
Mixed 254
SusWrite 176
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 39.9
143% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 135
129% 203 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 191 193 193 193 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 147
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 192
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$7
12GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 17 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 31
Write 20.3
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 17.3
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.4
123% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/4GX KHX2400C11D3/4GX Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.3% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78M-A Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A78M-A - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback