Supermicro X10SLL-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemSupermicro X10SLL-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SLL-F
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '18 at 09:00
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$275
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
57.3% Above average
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 194
69% 146 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 328
41% 305 Pts
64-Core 380
26% 380 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 68%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 122 129 124 116 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 493
Write 132
Mixed 158
SusWrite 120
49% 226 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 25.6
120% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 61.6
91% 177 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 73%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$28
18GB free
Firmware: DEMC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 31 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 37.2
Write 59.8
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 34
28% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
33% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 62%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
17GB free
Firmware: 1C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 55.4
Write 55.9
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 34
33% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 35%
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB
44GB free
Firmware: A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 42 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 34.2
Write 38.3
Mixed 29
SusWrite 42.7
27% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 35%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 128 127 131 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 131
Write 135
Mixed 108
SusWrite 129
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB
1GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 6.6 6.2 5.7 6 7.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.48% Terrible
Read 26.7
Write 9.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 6
13% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.6
140% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 19.4
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 20.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X10SLL-F Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Supermicro X10SLL-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $275
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback