Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '21 at 23:44
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 460-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 104
43% 71.7 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 148
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Device(1B0A 9083) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 0.5
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 1.8
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480 480GB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 89 14 9.1 48 2.7 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.5% Poor
Read 119
Write 93.6
Mixed 64
SusWrite 40.2
18% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 13
42% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 24.5
DQ Mixed 19.2
15% 20.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 52%
WD WD3200AVCS-632DY1 320GB
106GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 59
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 79
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 50%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB
21GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.5 6.2 6.3 5.7 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 5.8
8% 6.15 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 800 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback