Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-VS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '19 at 10:36
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4320 Quad-Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 127
57% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 196
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 344.75
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.8% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 55.5
37% 46.9 fps
MRender 56.4
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 0.13
22% 31.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVCS-632DY1 320GB
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.3 8.2 8.9 12 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 57.6
Write 48.7
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 11.5
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 50%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
2GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.1 4.1 4 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 4.3
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 4.1
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7.2
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback