Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '19 at 07:35
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 90.1
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 162
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 158
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 10.8
12% 13.4 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 15.6
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 90 56 53 61 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.8% Average
Read 252
Write 239
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 77.3
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 24.5
94% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 148
107% 142 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
931GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 144 147 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 141
Write 156
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 144
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.3
250% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-MX R2.0 Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback