Apple MacBookPro15,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro15,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937A206F2EE63C01
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 14:56
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 705
74% 591 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 907 MHz, MLim: 1470 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 23.4
15% 21.6 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 15
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 116.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 961
Write 1,244
Mixed 745
220% 983 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 16
62% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 938
DQ Write 406
DQ Mixed 482
407% 608 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 80%
Sandisk PLUS 480 480GB
58GB free
Firmware: UG43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 142 43 16 79 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 402
Write 348
Mixed 182
SusWrite 113
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 10.1
36% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 62.6
DQ Write 78.5
DQ Mixed 25.5
32% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.4
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 25.5
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro15,1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro15,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback