Asus A58M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A58M-E  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 08 '16 at 22:22
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 25.2
2-Core 45.7
29% 41.8 Pts
4-Core 62
8-Core 67.1
8% 64.6 Pts
64-Core 68.6
4% 68.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1013.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.77
Parallax 1.84
1% 1.97 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 4.37
Splatting 3.52
3% 3.88 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 960GB
231GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 74.4
Write 59.5
Mixed 65.9
50% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.16
4K Write 4.49
4K Mixed 2.55
540% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 41%
Virtual Disk 500GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 79.1
Write 60.3
Mixed 68.9
52% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.67
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 2.72
577% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 160GB
6GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 30.6
Mixed 5.94
26% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.63
4K Mixed 0.24
31% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.3
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.3
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58M-E Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A58M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback