Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI GENE  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '16 at 04:52
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 202
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 569
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6869
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 59.2
49% 62 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 56.8
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
D2CSTK251A10-0240.P 240GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 189
Write 157
Mixed 142
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 18.2
117% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 27.4
62% 127 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
464GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 145
Write 145
Mixed 138
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.26
112% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G16002 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 1302 PSD34G16002 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 13.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI GENE Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI GENE - $133

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback