Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140801
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 07:23
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 118
53% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 191
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
MSI(1462 3020) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 15
10% 13.6 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 15.1
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 142 98 112 138 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 80.3
Write 130
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 132
69% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
78% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$49
117GB free
Firmware: 3.ADA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 66.2
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 68.8
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler SE6 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.2 3.3 3 3.2 2.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 2.9
8% 7.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/8G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 13.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0 Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+ R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback